UNIVERSAL AUDIO PLUGINS VS WAVES HOW TO
UNIVERSAL AUDIO PLUGINS VS WAVES UPGRADE
UNIVERSAL AUDIO PLUGINS VS WAVES SOFTWARE

The Apollo one simply lets console do all the record monitor plugins as well as the monitor mixes. The StudioRack operation is a little more complex than the UA one because it does this double duty. DiGiGrid does this by putting the monitor path and the playback path in a single StudioRack plugin in your DAW that switches automatically so you hear the same plugins for record and playback (but not printing them). In order to hear the same sound on playback you either print the input sound or put all the same plugins on the track that you used on the track in the console. UA does this by giving you a front end for all your plugins when recording (UA Console).

UNIVERSAL AUDIO PLUGINS VS WAVES HOW TO

One more thing about UA, their CS is absolutely first class! :)ДiGiGrid and Apollo are both answers to the question of how to record with plugins and not be tied to the ProTools Buffer. UA plugs are very good and very addictive imho, I currently have 12 sharc chips available for mix and I'm just about getting away with that, I will be adding another octo card very soon. You will certainly need plenty of DSP power to replace your Waves bundle. The Apollo is a fantastic interface, I have had one for about 6 months and I love it. So if you will decide to sell your Mercury bundle finally, you might be aware of that you probably will have to invest inДЄn additional satellite sooner or later to be able to use all your UAD plugins extensively. Whole mixes on itВґs own from my personal experience (except the mixes are only of small size).

What you may be aware of.if you would want to replace all your Waves plugins in your mixes, you would need to getДЄn additional UAD Satellite with 4 sharcs in the future at least because the Twin will not be powerful enough to manage I also have a Apollo now (also had a Quartet and a Duet together previously) and I also have tons of Waves and now a The hardware preamp' like it does via the Unison technology. It will work like a normal plugin and not 'in conjunction with Would insert it in a standard slot in the Console software. Even if you record via any Waves console/preamp plugin in Digigrid it only will work like if you So far it doesn't seem like Waves/Digigrid has anything similar to UA's Unison.

I would be interested if anyone has had this same dilemma.

UNIVERSAL AUDIO PLUGINS VS WAVES SOFTWARE

Am I wrong?ДЄlso, from watching the videos about the IOS on Digigrid's website, it seems like Digigrid's software interface is a lot more complicated than UA's Console 2. So here is my dilemma: As far as my future upgrades, it would be logical to eventually go the Digigrid IOS route because of my Waves plugin investment, however I have fallen head over heals for UA's products for their ease of use, quality, and specifically their Unison technology.

UNIVERSAL AUDIO PLUGINS VS WAVES UPGRADE

With the upgrade to Pro Tools 12.2, which introduced several HD-only features, I feel like I am using an HD rig with my UA Apollo DSP. (I could sell my Mercury bundle, but then I wouldn't be able to pull up old mixes) Part of me is kicking myself as to why I didn't discover UA sooner and made my investments in there products instead of Waves.

I have been absolutely amazed by the quality of Universal Audio's plugins and the Apollo interface with built in DSP. Earlier this year I upgraded my Apogee Duet to a UA Apollo Twin.

Now I'm using Pro Tools 12 (vanilla) and Waves Mercury bundle. I've been a Pro Tools user since version 5.1 with a Digi 001 and a Waves plugin user since about that same time. Has anyone seen any gear shootouts between these products?

Universal audio plugins vs waves